Medieval and Renaissance Art

7/23/2012

Answer each of the following questions in complete sentences. You may make one response and simply number the answers. Once you have made your own post, respond to two other classmates by asking questions, making comments, or explaining why you agree or disagree.
Questions:
1.      How are the subjects of the earlier paintings (1300s – 1500) different from the later paintings (1500-1600s)?
2.      How did the colors change over time?
3.      Which images look more real? Why?
4.      Which images look more flat? Why?
5.      What do you think these paintings say about the lives of the people living at that time?
6.      What do you think happened between the late 1400s and the early 1500s that changed how and why artists painted?

173 Comments

Amahgia.H.elv6

10/16/2012 07:54:51 am

1)The ones in the (1300's-1500)arre older then the ones in the(1500-1600's.2)The colors changed over time because the ones in the (1300's-1500)are righter and the ones are(1500-1600's are darker then the other ones.3)The ones in the (1300's-1500)look more ralbecauuse they have more details then what the other ones have.4)I would say the ones in (1300's-1500) only because they look real but they also look flat.5)I think that they helped the people learn about there history and what they did for there history.6)I think diffent things happend at diffrent times and thats how they made the pictures in the diffrent lire times you draw the pictures to help you know more about your history, know what is going on.

carolina.h.elv2

10/17/2012 07:28:06 am

I agree on most of your answers, but I do desgree on your answer #4. The reason I desgree is beacuse you didn't explain it right how does it look flat to you. Well I do agree the ones in the years from 1300-1500, but I wanted to know how they look flat to you.

Laura.M.Elv1

10/18/2012 01:21:09 am

I Agree with your answer but i don't uderstand and agree with your answer for #4 because i thought it looked fake because it had all those bright colors and because usally when you see cartoons you see them colorful.

layton.d.elv1

10/9/2013 09:48:31 am

me too I agree I didn't get 4s answer

Z'naria.G.Elv6

10/18/2012 10:17:46 am

I disagreee with your number 4 slightly because it seems that it could not be " not flat and flat" because its blury but i also agree because i see how think it is more realistic from the features represended in the photo's.

Raquon.M.Elv6

10/19/2012 01:57:22 am

I Agree because it we couldnt tell if it was flat or not.

Jordan.H.Elv3

10/21/2012 05:49:59 am

I don't agree with you on number 1 because their is a lot more color in the early pictures than in the later pictures, like in the late pictures their is a black wall behind the picture and hardly had any color on the picture but you can see the picture in the early times.

Nancy.elv.3

10/21/2012 10:28:19 am

I agree with you. I understand how you feel with number 4 because to me 1325,1350 and 1397 look like cartoons or somethig like that.

Elvington 10/25

10/24/2012 09:34:18 pm

You did not describe the subject matter.

alexfink

1/15/2013 11:59:02 pm

what

Marie.h.Elv3-4

10/17/2012 06:04:27 am

The difference between the earlier ones and the later ones are that the earlier ones are more animated and the later ones are modern like a portrait.The Colors changed over time because the later the years go the more inventions they have.They Paintings that look more real are the later ones because the look more realistic and if you compare the later portraits to modern day they look the same. The images that look flat is the earlier ones because if you look at them compared to the later ones they look more flat.I think that the people in the portraits look happy because its was called the "The Golden Age" and it felt like it to.What i think about what happened between 1400s and the 1500s are that the artisans changed there mind when they were painting and decided to try something new.

reb.c.elv2

10/18/2012 04:55:32 am

I agree and disagree with Marie on #4 because I do agree the 1300-1400 images do look flatter, but you didn’t give me any proof and explanation on why that is your answer. I think that they look flat because the 1500-1600 images have more dimensions.

Avery.H.elv3

10/22/2012 11:30:14 am

I disagree with number one. I disagree with it because I feel like the first group of paintings aren't animated at all because they look so flat and unrealistic. I apreciate your different view point, but I disagree with it.

Jackson.H.Elv2

10/17/2012 07:08:56 am

1. The 1300-1500 paintings differ from the later paintings because the earlier paintings aren't as detailed as the later paintings.
2. The colors from the 1300-1500 paintings dull over time and the pictures get a little disoriented, but in the later paintings the colors get brighter and look newer.
3. The 1500-1628 paintings look more real because the artist back then were more talented and knew new techniques of art.
4. The 1300-1500 paintings look more flat because the artist back then probably didn't have certain techniques that can make pictures more realistic.
5. These paintings say that most wealthy people could only purchase paintings, because most of the 1500-1628 paintings have, what looks like, wealthy people with fancy dresses.
6. I think maybe the artist believed that paintings of people looked more beautiful than the 1300-1500 paintings did.

carolina.h.elv2

10/17/2012 07:39:09 am

I agree with your answers because you are right I will never think about this anwers.

reb.c.elv2

10/17/2012 11:28:20 am

I agree with all of your answers because that is what I put, but I would like to see some more details and explainations of what you put and why you put that. Please provide proof with your answers.

Laura.M.Elv1

10/18/2012 01:23:12 am

I Agree with all your answer especially with #6 i was thinking kinda like what you said except i thought that the artist were findingf new ideas.

Nick.w.elv2

10/18/2012 10:15:06 am

Thank you for making easier for me to read your questions.

Jordan.H.Elv3

10/21/2012 05:53:59 am

I do not agree with you on number one because the early pictures are so much more detailed than the ones in the later times, because the later pictures had a black screen behind it and the early pictures have a setting and a background that shows the picture.

ryne.d.elv1

10/21/2012 08:19:08 am

I agree with number two because the 1300-1500 paintings are duller than the 1500-1600 because they are brighter.

kyla.r.elv1

10/21/2012 11:19:48 am

I agree with your number one I never thought of it that way.

Damien.C.elv5

10/8/2013 08:45:58 am

on the 1st question the 1300-1500 paintings were brighter.

ashley searles

10/8/2013 10:41:42 am

i agree on #6 that people did that with paintings and they also preduce new technology in the period of time

carolina.h.elv2

10/17/2012 07:22:08 am

1) The paintings of the years 1300-1500 look more like cartoon than the paintings of 1500-1600 are a little more modern.

2) The paintings of the years of 1300-1500 are a little blury and from the paintings 1500-1600 are less blury to see, so the colors got better over time.

3)The images from from the years of 1500-1600 beacuse they look like if you just to a picture and printed it.

4)The images that look more flat are the images from the years of 1300-1500 because they didn't had good skill back then.

5)The images shows that they loved there religion and that they worshiped them alot. And usualy the paintings are from the wealthy people and how they lived.

6)I think that between the late 1400s and the early 1500s changed the world got a little more advanced and it was there most important years.

Laura.M.Elv1

10/18/2012 01:25:06 am

I Agree with all your answer, i didn't think of the stuff that you said though.

richardelv3blk

10/21/2012 08:48:27 am

i dont think they became advacwd just really boring nothing was going on it the life of a regular house hold that they needed to do with

tay.b.elv1

10/8/2013 08:40:22 am

on number one I agree it looks like a animation and blury

Damien.C.elv5

10/8/2013 08:48:15 am

You had great answers Carolina!!

Yurydia carro e1

10/9/2013 05:39:25 am

I agree on 5 because they do show love for Their religion.

Fauth.a. elv3

10/17/2012 07:38:19 am

1. The paintings in {1300-1500} are different because, the earlier ones are more brighter and full of color they have more than one person doing more than one thing, and the later ones are more dark and lifeless and they mostly have one person to two people. 2.) The ones in {1300-1500} are more bright and colorful, than the ones in {1500-1600} are darker and sad. 3.) I think the later ones look more real because there are more techniques in them and people knew how to do more things with art. 4.) I would say the ones in {1300-1500} are more flat because people didn't really focus on art so they weren't really on it and they didn't have the colors then and techniques. 5.) I would say the people that lived in the {1300-1500} times were happier and and more people believed in Christianity, the people that lived in {1500-1600} times were during the times of most of the empires fell and people were sad. 6.) I think what happened in the {1400-1500} was that people got smarter in art ways and they made new colors and techniques so they got to be better artist.

Z'naria.G.Elv6

10/18/2012 10:20:46 am

I agree with you faith on number 6 because i believe they did acomplish a new technique of design and painting.

Brianna.g.elv.3

10/18/2012 10:27:41 am

We said similar things for #6. They probally did learn new things over the years about art. I'm assuming they did as well because of the detailed paintings know as the later paintings.

Faith.a. elv3

10/17/2012 07:51:47 am

I disagree with Marie on number 1 because they not animated at all i could see where she could be getting at using those words but not meaning that but there not animated.

sebastian.c.elv3

10/18/2012 06:36:42 am

I agree with faith they arnt anamated

ryne.d.elv1

10/17/2012 07:59:09 am

1. The 1300-1500 paintings are different from the paintings from 1500-1600s because the 1500 paintings are of one specific person but the 1300 paintings are of multiple people.

2. The paintings from the 1300s are dull and the paintings from the 1500s are brighter and newer.

3. The paintings from the 1500s look more real because they are of one person and it looks like it could be a real picture.

4. The paintings from the 1300s look flat because the artist back then probably didn't have certain techniques to make them look more real.

5. It says that they only painted paintings of the government and the wealthy because in the 1300 paintings they are only of government and the 1500 paintings are only of wealthy people.

6. I think that the artist in the 1500s thought pictures of people look more beautiful than the ones of the 1300s.

kyla.r.elv1

10/21/2012 11:22:05 am

As i was reading your number one I noticed that I wasn't even thinking abot the number of people

Elvington 10/25

10/24/2012 09:41:09 pm

In your answer to #6, how would you define beauty.

Yurydia carro e1

10/9/2013 05:41:39 am

I agree on 6 the pictures are more prittier.

reb.c.elv2

10/17/2012 11:21:06 am

1)I think the subjects are different because the 1300-1400 paintings look more biblical and the 1500-1600 paintings look more like a portrait. The 1300-1400 paintings have biblical characteristics Painted in them like angels, halos, Jesus and some disciples and priests. The 1500-1600 images have a dark, dull portrait look with people, most likely the wealthy or rich, kings and head of churches. Another difference is that the 1300-1400 paintings are a scene and the 1500-1600 paintings are just a portrait.

2) The colors look different in the 1300-1400 pictures from the 1500-1600 pictures because the 1300-1400 painting have lots more color than the dark paintings of the 1500-1600’s. The 1300-1400 images have bright, colorful looking colors that a pastel look and feel to them especially the 1325 painting. The 1500-1600 images are darker and dull looking with colors mostly being black and brown.

3) I think that the 1500-1600 paintings look more real vs. the 1300-1400 paintings because they have more details and had a more perfected look. The 1300-1400 images have a more animated or cartoon look and feel to them. The 1325 picture is colorful and shows a scene of what looks like a feast or a special event at a church with the two priests. The image also doesn’t have faces on the people and looks a little blurry. The 1628 image shows a mother holding her child. It is very detailed because you can see every crease and shadow in the drapery and the robe. You can also clearly see the expression on the mother’s face.

4) The 1300-1400 images look more flat because the 1500-1600 images have more dimensions. The 1450 picture looks like the sea or ocean it sitting on top of those people’s heads and the 1325 picture it looks like the hills are popping up behind them and the trees are growing out of the people’s heads and bodies. The 1500-2600 images are painted at different angles and perspectives. The 1619 image is painted with a different point of view than the 1628 painting. The 1619 picture is painted with the man and girl facing the east and the 1628 picture with the mother and baby is facing the west.

5) I think that these paintings say a lot about the people living in those times. I the 1300-1400ls they say that those people were very religious and devoted to God and Jesus and were Christians. The paintings were all of Jesus Christ and angels and the bible. They pictures say that in the 1500-1600’s that the wealthy had the money and time to have their portraits painted and to show how proud they were of their money, power and wealth.

6) What I think happened during the late 1400’s-early 1500’s that changed how and why the artists painted is because they discovered new ways to make art and developed new technologies. They began to experiment new ways to mix colors and paints and invented pastels and perfected their work to make it better.

kenji.l.elv1

10/18/2012 06:04:07 am

i agree with you because you gave a lot of details and you took your time because it was reallt long.

sebastian.c.elv3

10/18/2012 06:39:03 am

i agree with 3 they were blurey

Nick.w.elv2

10/18/2012 10:19:12 am

I agree with number six because as time went on people got better at making more things at art.

Brianna.g.elv.3

10/18/2012 10:26:00 am

I really like your answers. You explained everything nicely.

Cambrea.S.ElV.3

10/18/2012 12:57:35 am

P1:It's different because threw the 1300's to the 1500's it's like showing us how and what they did to worship their kings and oueens.the 1500's to the1600's is different because their showing us the kings and oueens and their child.

P2:The colors in the 1300's pantings to the 1500's pantings are dull but when you get to the 1500's to the 1600's paintings they get brighter and you can see them clear, they look new.

P3:The 1500's pictures to the 1600's pictures look real because it looks like you just took a photo and the printed.

P4:The 1300's pantings to the 1500's paintings look more flat because the artist probaly didn't have relatic techqunies like 1500's to the 1600's paintings.

P5:The painting show that they love and worship their religiobn so much that they couldn't put it in words so they put it in a painting.

P6:It changed because they probably didn't have the art tequnies that they had in the 1500's to the 1600's so that why it changed.

alexfink

1/16/2013 12:04:43 am

i like number 1 its good

ashley searles

10/8/2013 10:45:55 am

why do you like question one so much did u just say that cause your bored

Yurydia carro e1

10/9/2013 05:45:23 am

I agree on 2 because they do look brighter.

kahari b.

10/21/2013 06:58:04 am

I think 1 is right to its a good response

Laura.M.Elv1

10/18/2012 01:18:27 am

1)The 1500-1628 pics are way differnt then the 1310-1497 because the 1310-1497 ones shown like religious kind of pics. Mean while the 1500-1628 ones seem to be showing leaders.

2)The colors changed alot because on 1500-1628 the picturse looks more dole. In the 1310-1497 ones it looks more colorful

3)The 1500-1628 look more real because those pictures have a person on it. It looks like a leader.

4)I think that the 1310-1497 pictures look more flat because the 1500-1628 pictures seem like the person is really there, in other words the picture looks 3D

5)I think that the 1310-1497 pictures tell that people believed in religion alot. The 1500-1618 ones tell me that those people in the pictures were probaly very important

6) Artist probaly started to experiment new to paint and when they saw what it turned out to look like they kept it. I also think that probaly people were migrating and when the artists saw what they had they liked it and decided to keep it and use it.

james.b.elv.6th

10/18/2012 05:09:20 am

1 because in the 1500-1600s look more real because its in or showing the religious beliefs, and the 1300 - 1400 shows the leaders
2 in the 1300 to 1400 the colors are more old, in the 1500 - 1600 the colors are more bright.
3 in the 1500 - and in the 1628 the pictures have a leader including
a person.
4 in the 1300 to the 1400 the paintings are old because the painter had different colors (dole).
5 that the people who are in these paintings are more important.
6 The painter ha different painting styles in that period time.

Elvington 10/25

10/24/2012 09:45:02 pm

Answers are in incomplete sentences.

cristobal_sor_elv2

10/18/2012 05:37:59 am

1) The subject that it appears to be based on is religious belifs and paintings.
2) The difference in the coloring is that the older ones look more "fake"as for the younger or newer ones look more realistic and 3D's
3) The ones that look more "real" are the ones from 1500 and up.i think they look more real because they improved their way or techinqes of drawing and their was more money people to have drawing careers so it improved greatly.
4) I would say that the one that look more "fake" are the one (s) that are from 1397 and below and that might be cause their colors were not as improved as the later times.
5) I think that these paintings would tell the people everthing cause people didnt know how to read very much back in the day so they depened on the pics to tell what was happening.
6) I think what happend to improve the way of painting that the colors were improved and their was money support artist

kenji.l.elv1

10/18/2012 06:02:13 am

I agree with you so far but you need to add more details and you should take your time because you put small details.

Alexis Graham

10/18/2012 08:30:50 am

I agree with what you said, and did not think that way on #6!

alex.b.elv6

10/18/2012 09:33:43 am

Yeah, all these answers are great and on 6, I thought of the paints being improved but I didn't think about how there was money to support them

Nancy.elv.3

10/21/2012 10:23:15 am

I agree with you but I also think that you should add more details.

kenji.l.elv1

10/18/2012 05:59:53 am

1) I think they are different because 1300-1500s are not about pictures of people. In 1500-1600s the people painted other people instead. there was people in 1300-1500s. The 1300-1500s are mostly about the people because there was pictures of people. The people though 1500-1600s are like real people and the 1300-1500 is like what they believed or worship.

2) The paintings are different because back then they didn't tell enough details. The paintings back then are also different becasue 1300-1500 are like ligher. The other painting 1500-1600 is really dark. The 1500-1600 paintings showed more details and i thinked that they had more colors than the 1300-1500 paintings. The 1500-1600 looked so clear and new to me.

3) The 1500-1600 looks more real to me because they are more clear and they wear clothes that somtimes people wear too. the 1300-1500 look fake because they are not clear. They also look not real because it looks like they made it up. The 1500-1300s picture looks great and they can also paint better than the 1300-1500. I think 1500-1600s is also real and they look like real people instead.

4) I think that the 1300-1500s look flat becasue maybe back then people didn't had not that not tools. The 1500-1600 is not flat because that mad it much more clear. the 1300-1500s looks so flat because they wasn't that much details and they do not look real. the 1500-1600 look real so they are not flat like the 1300-1500s pictures. The 1300-1500 looks fake and unreal to me.

5) I think the paintings were important to the people and they just wanted to kepted it for something. i thinked that the people in 1300-1500 that time was for their believes so maybe that's why they kepted it. the paintings might for important to them so they just wanted to keep it for important. i think that the pictures were maybe somebody from their family.

6) I thinked that at that time the people had more better tools. I also thinked that they had different styles. Maybe they just didn't want to paint like the others. the painters from 1500-1300s might planned what they were gonna write. Maybe the people can paint better than the others.

ryne.d.elv1

10/21/2012 08:27:25 am

I agree with number one because the 1300-1500 paintings are not just of one person but in the 1500-1600 paintings they are just of one person(kings and queens).

sebastian.c.elv3

10/18/2012 06:31:58 am

1. The subjects in the earlier paintings only had God in them and the newer paintings had common people in them.
2. The colors in the earlier paintings had brighter colors and in the newer paintings they had darker colors.
3. The newer paintings had a more 3D image to make them look more realistic.
4. The older images looked flat because they did not have depth perception.
5.The people in the older paintings still had robes and the newer ones had more modern clothes.
6. In the newer paintings artist probably had models to use and the older paintings were probably images out of their heads.

sam elv 2

10/18/2012 08:44:58 am

I do not quite agry whith #5 becus yes they did have (robes and the newer ones had more modern clothes) but the 1300-1500 had more holy picthers and 1500-1600 was more about what the artist really waned

richardelv3b

10/21/2012 08:51:02 am

6 how could they do that with out having a modle it like saying yeah i can hi a base ball with out a bat i think they would have to had models to make a master peace

Brianna.g.elv.3

10/18/2012 08:24:35 am

1.) In the early paintings (1300 - 1500), they're more like scenes of important things that happened at the time. These had Jesus in them, they're more like religious paintings. In the later paintings (1500 - 1600), are portraits. They show the queens who ruled at that time, and the Religion of Jesus.

2.) In the early pictures (1300-1500) the colors are more bright, they have some details in them, but is really tiny. In the older pictures (1500-1600) they're more darker, have more details. You can tell the artist spent lots of time working on one. The (1300-1500) paintings look more like a cartoon to me about religions. (1500-1600) paintings, they look actually real. And is based on history as well as the early paintings. The older paintings look more sophisticated to me than the early ones. Just because of the dark colors, and amazing details.

3.) I think the older paintings look more real, they have dark colors, and really good human-like characteristics. And at the time, they had new products and skills than they did back then, when they did the early paintings.

4.) I think to early paintings look flat, they mind me of cartoons but the subject is just on religion (s). These pictures have some details, but I dont think they are better than the ones in the later pictures. Back in the day, didnt have all the products and techniques they had when the later paintings were made.

5.) The early pictures are basically saying that at around those times, people was focused on religion. There were alot of pictures of Jesus Christ and what he represent (Bible, Angels, ect.). At the time, I think people followed Jesus, and wanted/became Christians.

6.) What I think happened between the 1400's and 1500's is the artists learning new techniques, learning to mix colors, and have the money to buy the new painting equipment. I think artists painted to express their feelings and emotions at the time, to show people what they can do. That's what art really is about.

Alexis Graham

10/18/2012 08:28:36 am

I agree with what you I thought the same way.

Z'naria.G.Elv6

10/18/2012 10:14:08 am

I agree with number 1 because it does seem as if it religous

Ale.Gra.Elv2

10/18/2012 08:28:01 am

1.) The difference between the earlier an later paintings is the earlier paintings look more like a lot of people in an event. The later paintings are one or two main people.
2.) The colors have changed over time because before they looked fake kind of like water colors. Then over time they got more like colors we use today. They look more real and less watery.
3.) The pictures that were made later on looked more real because of the details that they painted on them. The people look 3-D.
4.) The medival time pictures look more flat because I don't think people then understood that people should be painted the way they are seen, 3-D. Where as when people got more advanced, the people they painted looked a lot more three demensional.
5.) The paintings sais a lot about people at that time. That they only painted royalty or their kids or them together. They painted royal events as well.
6.) I think that artist became smarter and more advanced in the art ways. I also think that they devfolped better techniques. I think that they learned about 3-D too.

sam elv 2

10/18/2012 08:33:55 am

1. The first different fecher that you see is that the paintings (1300s - 1500) looks older and looks a little to two-dementaional.
2. The colors that they used in the (1300-1500) paintings is brigter and (1500-1600) they realy capterd the shading and used darker colors.
3. I say that the (1500-1600) look more realeistic becuse thy masterd the skin colors and shadeing in theis pices plus it looks more three dementional.
4. Defanetiy the (1300-1500) becuse shadeind is veary important to make it look more three-denentional.
5. In the (1300-1500) painting it's mostiy about religon becuse mosly all thay card about was religon, but in the 1500-1600 it was mosly about important pepole or enything.
6. maby they started to make schools so better lerning.

alex.b.elv6

10/18/2012 09:31:30 am

1) Some of the differences between the paintings are that the painting from 1310 looks more realistic than the other ones in it's group, during the medieval times. And, without a doubt, the paintings from the Renaissance seem way more realistic then the ones from the medieval times. The paintings from then, used more abstract paints than later because they used sophisticated paints.
2) The painting's color changed over time because of probably trade. Some people from far away places might have brought some new colors that the people who were settled might not have had.
3) As many have said, the paintings from the Renaissance do look more real than the other ones. This is because during the Renaissance, many artists had developed new ways to paint and they also understood what the world looked like and how to paint more realistic paintings.
4) The medieval paintings looked more flat because at this time the artists were not as advanced as the Renaissance painters. They also might've not had the sophisticated paints the Renaissance painters had that helped their paintings look better than the medieval times.
5) These paintings show me that religion was important to these people, they were religious. nIt's probably because at this time, it seemed as if the pope and the church ruled over everyone. Either that or that they were paid to draw these paintings which did happen a lot at this time.
6) During the Renaissance, there was a world filled with very skilled painters. This meant that they would never have done free drawings. This meant, however, that they would have to be paid in order to do a drawing for someone. The people back then, did not have much time to do things in their free time. Most of the life people lived in medieval time was hard work and suffering

Jarrod.H.elv1

10/22/2012 06:36:35 am

I agree with your number 3.

Elvington 10/25

10/24/2012 10:29:43 pm

These paintings were not free and could only be afforded by the wealthy elite.

Deonte.h.elv3

10/18/2012 09:47:39 am

1.I think the early paintings have a more colorful look to the them the older paintings do. The first paintings have fun colors bright colors and it looks fun and happy but the older paintings are sad and gloomy looking like its serious and not happy like the first.
2.The colors got darker from(1497-1500)they really got darker and they look like their self portraits of someones family or a king or ruler and a rich family but they look really sad and depressed.
4.I say the last four paintings look flat because there color looks sad and like the person is trying to show that he/she has power.
3.The paintings on the bottom look more real because they have more depth then the top ones and there darker plus they have real looking people in the painting.
5.I think it says that they were religious and spiritual and believed in gods or god and they like very bright and dark colors.
6.I think they stopped being so religious and started being more sad and serious so people wont think that there weak or just religious.

Z'naria.G.Elv6

10/18/2012 10:11:19 am

1) The subjects are diffrent in the pictures because in the medieval times there was alot of people in thepictures. The people were doing alot of things like moving around. In the Renaisance it's "silent" like, because the people are just hold babies or with a child .

2) The colors changed overtime from light to dark bold colors but the bold colors stand out more in the renaisance and it brings more affection to the viewer.

3) The renaisance looks more real because they don't look like they were easily drawn and sketched. It looks as if the artist took a camera and had taken a picture. It looks very realistic to me.

4) The medieval looked very flat to me because You make think that the renaisance is boring but that is incorrect becuase it has more detail to afffection and strong textures of the pictures that will catch a viewers eye. But the other looked as if it was drawn and its very fuzzy so it looks unrealistic.

5) They seemed to be wealthy and well mannered asnd very proper. They dreesed very well and they looked mature and good- looking, they seemed like serious proper people who were very tidy with what they said and did.

6) It changed by boldness and skill because he took the change by the the diffrences and time peroids and he also he drew it in more of an updated style.

Nick.w.Elv2

10/18/2012 10:13:35 am

1.How are the subject of the earlier paintings (1300-1500) different from the later paintings (1500-1600)? In the earlier paintings they include more people and brighter colors. In the later paintings they have darker colors and have at most two people in one painting.People may wanted to be more accurate on the people so they just simply used less people in the later paintings.
2. How did the colors change over time? The later the are, the darker the colors are used in them. The earlier paintings are much more lighter and brighter. It might have been a sad time for people during this time because most people tend relate sadness to darker colors.
3. Which images look more real? The later paintings look more real because they have less people and they are more accurate on the people in the paintings.The earlier paintings are not as accurate because they have more people so the artist can not focus on them too much.The later paintings are much more better than the earlier ones.
4. Which images look more flat? The earlier paintings look more flat because you can not really see a very good outline of the body's. In the later paintings they don't have as many people in the paintings so they are less flat than the earlier ones. So the lesser the people you got the more accurate painting your going to get.
5. What do the paintings say about the lives of people living at that time? The later paintings are very dark so maybe people were sad because people tend to relate dark colors to sadness. The earlier paintings were lighter and brighter so people were probably happy during this time period because people tend to relate light colors to happiness. Paintings can express people feelings towards something or someone.
6. What do you think happened between the late 1400s and the early 1500s? Many revolutions were going on during this time so that brought death and sadness.That probably why people were most likely sad because of the people dying. So the artists express their sadness by using darker colors when they painted.

Emma.G.Elv1

10/18/2012 11:12:11 am

1. The earlier paintings depict groups of people that may have been Christian scenes. The later ones show just one or two people.
2. The early paintings have bright, colourful backgrounds. The ones made later on had dark, sort of depressing backgrounds, matching the people's expressions.
3. The later ones look more realistic because they're more detailed.
4. The earlier ones look flat because because they are less detailed and don't have shadows like the later ones.
5. The first ones show people socializing and getting along. The other ones show one person with a serious expression, looking as though they do not want to be there.
6. I think a war might have happened, or something just as depressing. People stopped being happy.

Kayla.B.elv2

10/18/2012 10:17:45 pm

1)The pictures in the 1300-1500 are old because they didn’t have that much ideas on what to use to paints.in the 1500- 1600 they devolop new ideas and colors on what to use to make the pictures stand out alittle.
2)The early paintings they were bright and colorful but the later painting they were dull not that much color were added to them.
3)The later pictures because they were dull and they made it stand out more correctly and make it better.
4)The early pictures because it was more color added to them and not that 3d.
5)In the early pictures everyone was together and they were sharing.in the late pictures they was just 1 person that they probaly worship.
6)They probaly got into war again and killed some painters then new painter came out and devolop more skills then before.

Jalen.Klu.elvblk3

10/19/2012 12:39:11 am

1.They are different because it shows different people and things,etc.2.The colors changed overtime by using other different colors than the prievious colors.3.The one that I think looks more real is the last one(1628)because it has mor color and details to me.4.I think 1497 looks more flat becauser of its shape.5.I think their lives were both good and bad at that time.6.It changed because the artists painted other people and things,etc.

isai.b.elv2

10/19/2012 12:57:35 pm

1. On the earlier paintings, you can see the not as good color and their is more religious figure paintings.
2.The colors changed over time because people put in more detail and better ways of making paint/color.
3.in the painting of 1628,Mary is painted very detailed with reflection of light on her face and 3 dimensional parts of the painting.
4.In the painting of the 1500's the picture of a queen their is really no dimensional parts of the body painted or objects they are all 1 dimensional.
5.Some people were very religious , or some people just really liked to paint.
6.I think global convergence took part in the way people believed or thought of things.Maybe the very religious painters turned from painting a lot of religious figures to painting more kings and queens than religious figures.

Jordan.H.Elv3

10/21/2012 05:46:09 am

1. To me the earlier pictures are different than the later pictures because the earlier pictures their is more color and their is a lot more people in the early pics than in the later pics because the later ones only had 1-2 people, where as in the picture during the 1300-1400's had twice as many people in them.
2. Their was a ton more color in the early pictures because they had a color to go a long with the people and had a background that went a long also. I think that the color was much more real in the early times than in the later because in the later pics their was hardly to no color at all.
3. To me earlier images look more real because the color and the background. In the early times they had a better image than in the later because the later pics had one color and earlier times had a ton of color.
4. The later pictures looked more flat because their is no background that would support the picture all was in the back was a black screen which doesn't tell you anything about the image.
5. I think that in the olden ages their was more colors that were forgot about by the the time had come for the later times. To me there is a lot more colors out know but people apparently didn't like colors because their pictures look very boring.
6. How I think art changed over the years were that people in the earlier times went to school for art instead of learning other things so in the later times they didn't have as much people go to school to learn art as they were hoping to.

richard3belv

10/21/2012 08:45:15 am

1 they stop making them of other people and start making them of them selfs. 2 they went from being somewhat bright to somewhat dark. 3 they are more real because of them being ove there self and that makes it more real looking. 4 the ones withthe portrets on them it dosnt have many diffrwenet shapes.5 in the 15 and 1600 i think they were bored and sad and didnt have alote to do. 6 the middle class and more money people got money so they were like hey make a painting of me and ill pay you so and so and then it becane a trend.

Samuel.R.Elv.1

10/21/2012 09:26:47 am

1) The reniassance paintings do more with church topic, there's a picture with Jesus which stands for christianity , the medieval paintings do more with like kings,queens.2) The colors with the Medieval paintings gives the painting a better seeing, more realistic. The colors with the reniassance painting its very hard to tell & the colors look faded. 3) Medieval looks more realistic, because the in the painting you can see the people like if they were realistic making them look real.4) Reniassance, because the colors, the people in the pictures cant see them really well, doesn't look realistic at all. 5) I think it says how they lived, or probably like the pictures with the people for medieval were probably an important person to its empire or country during these times. Also with reniassance , how christianity was back in these days.6) What changed I think is with the time with the reniassance's the pictures didn't look really well I think during this time they didn't have the materials to make it look realistic, also later in this time with Medieval I think the people were smarter knew more things, discoveries , had the right materials to make painting better.

Jarrod.H.elv1

10/22/2012 06:35:14 am

IK agree with all of your answers. You put alot of thought into your answers.

Elvington 10/25

10/24/2012 11:03:20 pm

Do not use text speech in your response.

Nanct.elv.3

10/21/2012 10:19:46 am

1. I think that they are different because in the paintings 1500-1600 are paintings of people. In the paintings 1300-1500 paintings of specific people.
2.I think that the colors changed to being brighter. The paintings 1500-1600 are brighter than the paintings 1300-1500. The colors stik out more than in the paintings 1500-1600. Even though the paintings 1300-1500 have more colors.
3. I think that the paintings 1500-1600 look more real. I think that the paintings 1500-1600 look more real because you can se the peeople's faces.In the paintings 1300-1500 you cann't see their faces so it looks less real.
4. I think that the paintings 1300-1500 look more flat. I think that the paintings 1300-1500look more flat because you cann't tell what the people are doing. For me the paintings 1300-1500 look more like cartoons.
5.I think that the paintings 1300-1500 are about Jesus. In the painting 1325 looks like when Jesus was a baby and the three wise men came to visit him. In the painting 1310 it looks like Jesus is in the middle. In the paintings 1500-1600 it looks more like paintings of kings or queens.
6. I think that changed is that the people painting the paintings stoped being religious and started focusing more in the other people.

kyla.r.elv1

10/21/2012 11:16:36 am

1. The paintings are different because in the 1300-1500's the paintings are brighter and then through the 1500-1600's they are more dark and not as bright.
2. Over time the colors changed from brighter to darker.
3. The pictures from the 1500-1600's look more real because they look like actual people.
4. The pictures from the 1300-1500's look more flat because they dont look real.
5. I think these images tell that religion was very important at this time.
6. I think the way artist painted changed between the 1400-1500's is people wanted their paintings to look more real.

Ana.lop.elv3

10/21/2012 12:11:37 pm

1. The pictures the through the 1300-1500s the paintings were about religion and belief whilst the others were about authority figures or people they looked up to. The one from 1325 shows a scene from the bible, I believe which is the birth of jesus was painted whilst the one from 1500 was a picture of a queen/authority figures. I believe that peoples minds grew so not just jesus and the bible scenes, it had a little more meaning.
2. The colors changed from brighter colors to kind of darker things. The colors changed from the bright blues golds and reds.The one from 1560 is in the dark shaded, her dress is black and so is the background. As well as the one fro 1619, the man’s clothes were dark green, the child was wearing the brightest thing in the picture, an off white. Whilst the one from 1325 it was bright and full of color.
3. The ones from the 1500-1600 are more real looking than the ones from 1300-1500s look a little less realistic. The one 1310 was like less realistic than the 1560 which shows a lot of detail, whilst the other one was a little cartoony looking. The 1325 one is a lot cartoony looking , like the legs weren't outlined or the clothes were just a drape of cloth.
4. The images that look more flat are the ones between 1300-1500s. The look more flat because the don't have many details and texture. They look cartoony and kind of not developed.whilst the other ones were more drawn with texture and details than the others.The people of that time weren't that artsy than the later times.
5. What do i think these paintings say about the lives of the people living at that time was that religion was highly important to people in the 1300-1500s. The people painted mostly about it so it had to important. Whilst the 1500-1600 the higher authorities were important to the. The painters drew queens and stuff so it had to be important to use the time on them.
6. What do i think happened between the late 1400s and the early 1500s that changed the paintings is that people sat there and thought how can i change this and make it better. As well as people had better things to paint with.People also started to paint people instead of scenes and stuff from the bible. There might also be new methods invented to paint

Palmer.R.Elv3

10/22/2012 05:42:49 am

1) The earlier paintings are different because of the way the painting is angled. The earlier have more things in them and are painted from a perspective that is further away. The later paintings just try to let you focus on one thing by making it look close and emphasizing a specific part.
2) The colors changed in the 1500's from being a poor quality color (fuzzy and hard to see) to being more modern like today's colors.
3) The paintings after the 1500's looked more real than the others. The color was more modern, allowing the viewer to have a better idea and understanding of the painting. Also, it focused mainly on one very detailed object.
4) The earlier paintings looked more flat because they painted it only so that it looked like it was in 2-D. Later on, they were able to layer the painting to make it seem like it was real.
5) The early paintings, people focused mainly on religious ideas.
It seems like they were doing rituals and ceremonies in the painting while also showing important people a part of the religion. The later paintings showed they respected and they focused on worthy people, or important officials.
6) The change of paintings could've been from a discovery of importance for something else. People may have been great minded because of the scholars that taught them, and were able to come up with this new way of painting.

Jarrod.H.elv1

10/22/2012 06:33:12 am

1. The subjects of the earlier painting(1300s-1500) look to be biblical where the later paintings seem to be portraits of important people. The earlier pictures have more people in them where the others are only portraits.

2. The colors changed overtime because the 1300s-1500s are brighter and they used alot of gold. in the 1500s-1600s the colors are darker.

3. The images that look more real are the ones from the 1500s-1600s because they look more realistic where the others look like flat drawings.

4. The images that look flat are the ones from 1300s-1500s. They look flat because they don't show good skills and depth.

5. The paintings say about the lives of the people of this time that religion was very important and the rich had pictures made of themselves.

6. I think what happend between 1400s-1500s was that the artist changed the colors that they used.

tay.b.elv1

10/8/2013 08:38:40 am

I agree with number 5 that was what they did a lot when they had free time

Jalen.Ni.elv.3

10/22/2012 07:26:30 am

1. How are the subjects of the earlier paintings (1300s – 1500) different from the later paintings (1500-1600s)? The earlier paintings have a lot more people in them. They also have a lot more bright colors to them instead of mostly dull colors in the later paintings. The other thing is the later paintings look more real instead of looking like just a painting.
2. The colors started to fade out and began to become dull colors. The only color I saw that wasn't to dull was the red in the 1500 painting.
3. The later paintings look more real because of the devolepment of better technique in painting.
4. It is the opposite of why they look so real. THe did not have the better technique learned.
5.To me it just looks like the rich people had paintings of themselves by what the paintings people and things looked like.
6. I think they got new ideas from the other cultures and civilizations.

jada.b.elv3

10/22/2012 07:46:06 am

1.The pictures from the 1300-1500s were mostly about the peoples religion and what they believed in. Most of the other images were about who ruled over the people(had authority over them, laid down the law). The image from 1325 clearly shows a scene or part of a story from the time it took place.It could also be a story from the bible.IT was basically showing the birth of Jesus possibly. The photo from the 1500 could show a queen that ruled in the time period.

2.I can tell times changed a lot. Most of the colors with the time to.It went from happy lively colors to dark sad looking colors.The photo has blue, and reddish looking colors like the artist could have mixed colors.The 1560's photo has an middle aged woman in a black dress. The background of the image had a dark color. I think that the entire picture and the clothes were high lighting her mood possibly.

3.The image 1500-1600 look very real. It has a lot of details that gave me the clues that led to the answer.This look as it, it could really happen. 1325 is made up of many different bright colors. The photo is painted where you can not see the faces of the people.It also has a blurry look to it.In 1628 the picture shows a young looking mother and her baby. You can really see this clearly.

4.1300-1400 images are easy to see. You can compare them to the 1500-1600 photos.1500-1600 has a lively feeling to it,also has a lot of dimension to it.The remaining photos have a nature like element to it.That was helpful to make it look well.

5.Most of these paintings speak a lot about how people were living in those times.1300-1400's show very religious things about them and how they lived. 1500-1600's looked like they had more money and had a more developed system.

6.What I believed happened in the 1400 and the beginning of 1500 what changed was how the artists came up with new ideas. They invented new color combinations to use in more of their art work.

Avery.H.elv3

10/22/2012 11:26:28 am

I agree with all of your answers, especially number two. I especially agree with number two because I love your idea about the dark colors in the later paintings maybe referring to the mood of the person in the painting.

layton.d.elv1

10/9/2013 09:45:16 am

I agree with all of the answers too as well

Avery.H.elv3

10/22/2012 11:24:01 am

1)The paintings in 1300-1500 differ from the paintings in 1500-1600 because of subject matter. The earlier paintings seem to be about Jesus Christ and religious things like angels. The later paintings seem to be more about specific people or are portraits of important people. The subject seemed to shift from religious things to social things.

2)The colors in the paintings seem to differ between the two groups. The first group of paintings seem to be more bright and natural looking colors. The second group of paintings seem to be darker, and less vivid. I think this change occured because the second group of paintings seem to have a more serious topic, hence more serious colors. The first group of paintings seem to have a less serious, more happy topic, hence happier and brighter colors.

3) The second, later group of paintings seem more real to me. I think the second group of paintings look more real because the darker colors and shading in the painting make it look more dimensional and realistic. The people in the paintings also seem to have more expressions and detail which makes them look more realistic aswell.

4) The fist group of paintings look flatter to me. I think they look flatter because the painters did not have the knowledge or know how to use darker colors in contrast with the light ones to create the effect of shading and dimension. I think that a lack of knowledge caused this.

5)These paintings say many things about the people living during their times. The first group of paintings shows that people during this time (1300-1500) were very devoted to their religions and beliefs. The second group of paintings shows that people during this time (1500-1600) were very devoted to their leaders and social life.

6) A change seems to occur in the styles of the paintings between the late 1400s and the early 1500s. I think this change in art styles and the way painters painted was because of Global Covergence. Global Convergence is the spread of ideas so maybe when ideas were being spread around the globe, more knowledge of art was given to the Europeans and so their art started to look more realistic and dimensional.

jada.b.elv3

10/23/2012 10:58:16 am

I strongly agree with number 4. I thought that they used darker colors for their paintings to.

arrawn y. elv. 5th

10/10/2013 05:04:41 am

i agree... Wow thats looong

Anson.L.elv3

10/23/2012 10:43:18 am

1) The newer paintings look a lot more dull and less creative. If you look at the 1450 painting compared to the1560 painting the 1560 painting is much less colorful and is one thing, Where the 1450 painting is very colorful and has many things in it.

2) Over time painting became daker and less colorful. If you look at the 1325 painting compared to the 1619 the 1619 painting is very plain and consists of mostly dark colors. The 1325 paiting is very bold and contains diffrent colors and there are diffrent things going on.

3) The paintings seem to get more detailded as time goes on. If you look at the 1497 painting compared to the 1560 painting the 1497 look like spoltches, becouse there are more things in the painting there is not as much room for detail. The 1560 on the other hand looks very real, becouse it is only one thing, therefore it has more room for detail.

4) As time goes by paintings look more flat. If you look at the 1497 painting compared to the 1500 painting, the 1497 has more defanition beouse there are more things in the painting that make it look more defined. The 1500 painting looks more falt becouse it has less things in the painting which does not allow as much defanition.

5) As time goes on peaple seem to not symbolize god as much in there art. I you compare the 1310 painting to the 1500 painting the 1310 painting consists of jesus and other christian pleaple. In the 1500 painting it consists of women and thats it, nothing religous.

6)I think the artists that painted these paintings bagan to be influenced by diffrent peaple and/or places as time went on. If you look at the older painting they all lok yo be one style. If you look at the newer paintings they are all one style but they are a tottaly diffrent syle.

courtney.B.elv2

10/24/2012 12:26:31 pm

One: The paintings are different and have more color than the 1500 and 1600
The ones in the 1300-1500 are older than the 1500 to 1600
Two: How did the colors change overtime? : The colors from the 1300-1500 paintings dull, but in the later paintings, the colors get brighter and look newer.
Three: The 1619 and 1628 look more realistic the fact it looks like the author took more time, and back then they knew the techniques of how to do things right.
Four: The 1300-1500 paintings look more flat, the artist back then did not have certain techniques that can make pictures more real.
Five: The paintings say that most wealthy people could only purchase paintings, because most of the 1500-1628 paintings have, what looks like, wealthy people with fancy dresses.
Six: Between the late 1400s and the early 1500s changed, the world got a little more advanced and it was there most important years.

Elvington 10/25 - No more posts, PLEASE!!!

10/24/2012 11:09:52 pm

Any additional responses will need to be submitted in writing to the teacher.

jacob

11/8/2012 09:23:43 am

1. they look more realistic in 1500-1600.
2.they are more light in 1300-1500.
3.the ones in 1500-1600 because its older.
4.the ones in 1500-1600 because theirs only one person.
5.they advanced in colors and the way they paint.

tay.b.elv1

10/8/2013 08:35:55 am

you skipped number 6 and you hardly gave any detail

denver scaggs link

11/13/2012 09:57:34 am

the firs one is of the last supper. the color changed and became more realistic. the other paintings are more realistic and uses vanishing point.

William.S.elv.1

10/8/2013 06:24:02 am

Q:1 The differences between the earlier paintings(1300-1500) and the later paintings(1500-1600) are the earlier paintings have more colors in them and more brighter than the others and the later paintings are more darker than the others.The earlier paintings have different shapes than the later paintings, the later painting are all rectangles.The earlier paintings look like there worshiping people.The later paintings look likes they dressed up to go somewhere Q:2 Between the earlier paintings 1300-1500 the pictures were brighter Between 1500-1600 the picture were darker. The earlier paintings look like they were made with pastel and the later painting look likes they were made with ink or black paint. Q:3 The later paintings look real because they look like real people instead of the earlier paintings. Q:4 The later paintings look more flat than the earlier paintings because they don't have much color as the earlier paintings. Q:5 The earlier paintings look like they were worshiping in the paintings the later paintings look likes they were just standing there taking pictures (there lives look boring). Q:6 In the earlier paintings they were more brighter then the later paintings because they might not had as much paint then the others because you will have to find paint from different things like for example dirt,fruit,and others things from natures.

oliviaelv5

10/8/2013 06:47:16 am

1.IN the 1300-1500 there are more photos of religion then there are in the 1500-1600s photos.
2.The photos darkened
3.The 1500-1600s are real looking because they have that humanly look in stead of a cartoon look.
4.The 1300-1500s are flat because they have no pop to there photos.
5.I think that the pictures say that over the time period people were more wealthy and started to not be as religious then they were.
6. I think there was a big difference in money and peoples religions.

Giselle.G.elv5

10/10/2013 07:38:35 am

I disagree on number I don't think the pictures changed because of money. I think it changed because during that time people got smarter

Madelyn.S.elv3

10/8/2013 06:52:37 am

1. All of the earlier pictures seem to be very religious while the later pictures show what seems to be a royal or wealthy family. All of the subjects for the later pictures seem very happy and full of joy while the subjects of the earlier pictures are both happy and sad because they are worshipping something or someone. Over all, the pictures are differ in many ways but mainly through the emotions and actions of the subjects.

2. The earlier paintings seem to be more dull, with the colors being less bright. The newer paintings seem to have higher quality paint colors and they also seem to be better preserved through the years. I think that earlier in time, our methods for developing bright paint colors were not very effective and that is why the paintings look dull.

3. I think that the earlier paintings look more real because the scenery around the people seems to add a sort of 3-D effect to the way you look at it. When you look at the earlier pictures you can see a real looking image.

4. I think the newer images look more flat because the bright colors seem to add a more cartoony effect to the image.

5. The earlier images tell us that the people that lived during this time spent the majority of their free time worshipping their gods. The newer images tell us about the dress and wealth of the people during that time.

6. I think that the style of the pictures changed because the artists developed new techniques to make the pictures more beautiful.

chloe.r.elv3

10/8/2013 09:43:07 am

I agree with you on the answer to your first question because I too thought that the earlier pictures were from a more religious point of view while the other pictures seemed to be examples of royalty.

sarah white2

10/9/2013 04:52:43 am

I can agree with you on number 3 Maddie.

Dalton L. elv3

10/9/2013 06:07:57 am

I agree with you on your first answer because I also thought that the earlier painting were more religious.

Jason.P.elv5

10/10/2013 11:19:47 am

I disagree with you on your fourth answer because in the older paintings, there is not much detail and it looks really plain and 2-D, while in the later paintings, there is a lot of detail, especially in the clothing, and it almost looks like you are looking at a real picture

Kaylee.B.elv1

10/10/2013 12:08:11 pm

I agree with # 1 because that is kind of what I put down to .

riley.r.elv3

10/8/2013 08:27:45 am

Questions 1-2 October 8, 2013

The paintings changed over time here are some ways that they changed. The earlier paintings depicted family and friends gathering and celebrating the later pictures depicted royalty like the King and the Queen.

The colors also changed over time here are some ways that they changed. The earlier paintings were dimmer and less colorful while the newer ones where brighter showing more joy and pride in the painting while the other paintings gave a eerie dim sort of feeling.

tay.b.elv1

10/8/2013 08:31:12 am

1). in the older pictures they draw the pictures but they do not give details and the earlier pictures give a lot of little details which makes a big difference 2). in the earlier pictures the colors looked brighter which made it stand out and when we looked at it, it drew attention to the little details 3). the earlier pictures because they found new methods to draw and make there paintings better and more realistic.4). I thought the older pictures looked flat and the younger pictures tried to make there pictures 3 dimensional other than making it look flat 5).it describes people and their lives at that time and tried to tell people what is going on in there life 6).they made different colors by mixing colors together and they made different type of utensil's by finding material and combining them together

William Smith

10/9/2013 06:48:10 am

I agree with you on number 1,2,3,4,5,6

Arrawn y. elv 5th

10/10/2013 04:57:05 am

i agree too

Damien.C.elv5

10/8/2013 08:44:02 am

1 paintings 1300-1500 are not as good looking and seem to only portray religious events and paintings 1500-1600 are more detailed and they are portraits of people (mostly important people).
2 the colors during 1300-1500 are brighter but during the1500-1600s the colors were darker and sadder.
3 the 1300-1500 paintings were not as realistic as the 1500-1600 paintings because the 1500-1600 paintings are more detailed.
4 to me the 1300-1500 paintings look like I could feel them even if they look less detailed.
5 I think that the 1300-1500 paintings say that it was a real big time for religions and the 1500-1600 paintings say that the people are going through tough times.
6 I think that the people changed their art to dark and sad because it was a tough time for them.

chloe.r.elv3

10/8/2013 09:45:37 am

I agree with your answer to the second question but I also believe that the later paintings had less of a color variation.

Jason.P.elv5

10/10/2013 11:06:41 am

I agree with your first answer when you said that the portraits were of important people because they seem very well dressed and I think that it would cost a lot of paint and money because of the detail.

jalen.n elv2 link

10/8/2013 08:44:23 am

jalen.n evl2 link

10/8/2013 09:06:47 am

1.It has more details because back then they were there we wasn't so we cant get a exact picture how they looked
In the 1300-1500.
2.Today our colors be more brighter in most panting in 1300-1500 in there time there colors were more darker because that would be the color of there clothes.
3.the image that's has the time date of 1628 it looks more real because I think she was actually holding a baby and the painter drew a picture about how she looked.
4.1300-1500 it doesn't really even look real it looks flat maybe because the artiest didn't put any detail in the painting.
5.that they were very rich and were like kings and queen's
6.they started getting more and new colors and things changed new clothes.

Keya.D>elv3

10/11/2013 09:30:18 am

good job

chloe.r.elv3

10/8/2013 09:39:37 am

1. The subjects of earlier paintings are mainly showing a group of people that seem to be gathered in one place to meet, talk or pray. The people in the earlier paintings also seem to be meeting for a social even, the people seem to be going about their business naturally. While in the later paintings there is only one or two people and they are posing. The earlier paintings are more focused on everyday people, but the later paintings are more focused on well-off people.

2. Over time the colors become more rich and bright, but there were less of a variety.

3. The images from 1500, 1560, 1619 and 1628 look more real. These images appeared more real because of the brightness of the painting, what the people are wearing and the pose the people are in. The paintings are also clearer, easier to decipher.

4. The images from 1310, 1325, 1450 and 1497 look more flat. These images appeared more flat because of the color and dimness of the painting, what the people are wearing, the tone mood of the painting and there is not much clarity to what is going on in these paintings.

5. I believe that these paintings say that the lives of the people living at that time had strong religious faith and they took pride in their wardrobe and appearance.

6. I think between the late 1400’s and the early 1500’s the way artists painted changed because of religious beliefs, advances in technology, war, economy and way of life. I believe these reasons influenced the way artists painted and what they painted because if a war is going on at the time than an artist will most likely paint about a battle scene, if the artists country is under the rule of a new king or queen they will most likely paint a picture of that new king or queen and their children. Changes in many things affect an artists mood.

Dalton L. elv3

10/9/2013 06:11:24 am

I agree with you on your answer for #3 because the paintings during that time were more realistic.

William Smith

10/9/2013 06:50:35 am

I agree with you Chloe on them and nice job on it too.

Tamisha Walker

10/8/2013 11:17:16 am

Chloe.r.elv3 I agree to your statement due to the fact they only had black or gray colors to choose from. As they got into the 500's they started to make more colors to choose from to make different pictures.

Tamisha Walker

10/8/2013 11:31:02 am

@Madelyn.S.elv3 I disagree because from the 1300to1500 have changed special because photos changed

Neocia.T.elv5

10/9/2013 12:47:38 am

Q1: The subjects of the earlier panitings from (1300-1500) are diffrent from the paintings from (1500-1600) because the panitings from 1300-1500 are more than one people or a group festival the panitings from 1500-1600 are roalty men/women. Q2: The colors got more brighter and mor real. Q3: 1628 and 1500 pictures look more real to me because of the colors and how there were drawn. Q4: The other paintings look more fake to me because they look really dull to me its the colors. Q5: It tells who there were in life and what there were known by Q6: We started to grow and new ways to paint and draw were being made so the higher we grew the more we came of doing things.

Keya.D.elv3

10/11/2013 09:32:11 am

good job neocia

Nya.H.Elv.5

10/9/2013 12:53:52 am

1. The older one does not have much detail as to the (1500-1600) pictures.
2. They changed to look more mature and and realistic.
3. I think that the section from (1500-1600) look more real because it has more texture to it and more detail.
4: I think that the ones that look flat is the (1300-1500) section because it has no detail much to it.
5.I think it shows how much pain it's been through or they been through and how their lives been going.
6.

niya.b.elv1

10/9/2013 01:24:18 am

1.the pictures from (1300-1500's) was diffrent from (1500-1600) pictures because in the 1300's there pictures was groups of people and iin the 1500-1600 the had self portraits with one or two people.

2.the color changed over time by the colors got darker and in the 1600's they start adding less color to it like it wasnt a rainbow type.

3.the image that look more real was the 1628 one because they blue coat that she has on make the pictur stand out more and it make it look 3-D.

4.the image that looked flat was 1560 picture because it had less colr and you can only see black the most.

Yurydia Carro E1

10/23/2013 12:47:33 am

I agree on number 4

amya.b.elv2

10/9/2013 01:59:40 am

1. The paintings made in the (1300s-1500s) are different from the one in the ( 1500s -1600s) is because in the 1300s the paintings had groups of people meanwhile the paintings in the 1600s had 1 or 2 people in the painting

2. It went from lighter colors in the 1300s to darker colors in the 1500s but also in the 1500s the colors where alot bolder than in the 1300s.

3. The images in the paintings made in the 1300s made when there was paint that just made the paintings look fake but the paint ing in the 1500s looked real because there was more painting things that made the painting look like they where realistic painting.

4. The painting made in 1300s look flat because they didnt have any features that made it look 3demitional while the ones made in thhe 1500s look like they stand off the painting paper

5. The painting tells u that the people are different life styles some are very fancy and the others look like the people are different from our times

sarah white2

10/9/2013 04:51:08 am

1. That the paintings from that time are just families and the paintings from 1500s to 1600s are with mothers and their childs.
2. The colors changed over time by getting darker and clearer.
3.The last 4 pictures look more detailed and clearer.
4. The 1310 and 1450 because they hardly don't have any detail.
5. They were very poor and didn't pay attention to much detail.
6. They started to add more detail and color into their paintings.

Yurydia Carro e1

10/9/2013 05:30:20 am

1.) The picture from the1300-1500s are darker and the picture from the 1500-1600s are colorful.
2.) The artist started using darker colors.
3.) The picture from the 1560s because they out Linder the picture.
4.) The 1497s picture because they didn't paint thick enough.
5.) They were very religious.
6.) I think they wanted the picture to look real.

Dalton L. elv3

10/9/2013 06:04:50 am

1. The earlier painting look more religious while the newer paintings seem to be of wealthy or important people.
2. The earlier paintings have dull colors while the newer paintings have more brighter colors. I think that during the period of the newer paintings people found a better way to preserve paintings.
3. The newer paintings look more realistic because of the brighter colors that mix together with the darker colors.
4. The earlier paintings look flat because of the dull colors that are used.
5. During the time of the earlier paintings it seems that the people then were more religious, and the time period of the newer paintings show that the people were more fixated on themselves.
6. I think that artists developed newer styles and better techniques for their paintings.

kahari b. evl.3

10/21/2013 06:56:34 am

i agree with all answers i think they are all right

mariano r

10/9/2013 06:12:02 am

1.it was panted jusus in all the frist pantings then I think it was of fauos people then.

2.went the time when on they could use more stuff more pant to do pantings with.

3.the panting in the 1628.it look like it was in 3D.

4.the panting form 1325.it look like it coming to live.

5.there bilive, there live,cothes ,there ecomet.

6.there were get toclo over by other people.

Riley.r.elv3

10/9/2013 08:00:06 am

Questions 3-6 Wednesday 10/9/13

3. Which images look more real? Why?
4. Which images look more flat? Why?
5. What do you think these paintings say about the lives of the people living at that time?
6. What do you think happened between the late 1400s and the early 1500s that changed how and why artists painted?
3. Some images looked more real than other I think that the newer paintings looked more real because they has more color and they looked more like real people.
4. Some of the images looked more 2D than 3D because the older ones don’t have 1 person in it but many people and it looks flat. The newer ones looked more 3D because the painting had more time going into it and depicted 1 person or a small group of people.
5. The paintings tell different things about the people in that time frame. The older ones looked like a time of peace and harmony while the newer didn’t look war like but they weren’t the happiest of pictures.
6. Something changed during this time period that changed the art. The older ones in the medieval time were flatter and duller because that was the mood during that time frame war and sadness. The renaissance period is the time of rebirth in architecture, art and ways of life a time of wonder scientific accomplishments and the fascination of the gift of life making these paintings seem happier and brighter.

Madisonb.elv.5

10/9/2013 09:06:29 am

1. The differences and changes between the paintings in the 1300's- and 1500's change dramatically. In the 1300's the colors are darker, and very limited. But in the 1500's the colors began to look lively and lighten up.
2. They began to have more resources which means betters artists, and better quality things to paint with.
3. The paintings in the 1600's look more because is the people and not the backgrounds. Plus, they have better color choices.
4. The painting 1500 look more flat because the backgrounds and bodies looked smashed in. So that's why they look flat to me.
5. The paintings were dark to say life was hard, not only for single people, but people with families. It goes to say that those times were obviously not easy.
6. People became interested in art and the painting became more beautiful and interesting. It was also and getaway for people to get through bad times in life.

layton.d.elv1

10/9/2013 10:17:22 am

Q1. in the old pictures is bleary but in the new paintings, they are more clear.

Q2. the color looks better in the newer paitings, it has more detail in it

Q3. the 1500-1600s look more real as a painting because it has more detail and more features

Q4. the painting in the 1300s to 1500s because it doesn't have a lot of details

Q5.so people that live later can know about older history

Q6.we got/made different colors so they could add more detail to pictures

Kaylee.b.elv1

10/9/2013 10:56:12 am

1)In the 1300-1500s the pictures are about religion.In the 1500-1600s the pictures only have individuals and families in them.
2)The colors change over time from bright colors to darker colors.
3)The pictures from 1500-1600s look more real because they're more detailed.
4)The pictures from 1300-1500s look more flat because they don't look 3-D.
5)The people in the 1500-1600s are more religious than the people in the 1500-1600s are more about family.
6)The artists pictures changed thru time because artists became more experienced and the economy changed so the artists interest changed too.

Yurydia Carro E1

10/23/2013 12:45:11 am

I agree on number 2

Alyssa.J.elv5

10/9/2013 10:59:07 am

Q1: There is a great difference between the renaissance paintings from the time period 1300s-1500 and the time period of 1500s-1600. For instance, the first set of pictures(1300s-1500) seem to deal more with religion and the pictures include different people. The second set of pictures(1500s-1600) look to have more common people, I also think they could be royal families. Another difference involves the details in the pictures: The first set doesn't have as much detail as the second set.
Q2: The colors in the paintings from 1300s-1500s deal a lot with golds and browns, some reds every now and then but mostly the golden-mustard color. The later pictures seem a bit more vibrant. Even though there is quite a bit of black, the colors seem, in a way, kind of brighter.
Q3: I think the images from the 1500s-1600s look more realistic because of the detail the artist's included. You can see the complexion and texture really well and visualize the people of that time period.
Q4: The images from the 1300s-1500s look more flat. I think so because there isn't as much detail in the images as much as the ones from the 1500s-1600s. Also, the earlier paintings aren't as vibrant as the later images.
Q5: I think the paintings from the earlier time period explained the lifestyle of those people. The people from the time period of the 1300s-1500 were very religious and traditional. They were very concise in what they they were doing. The images from the 1500s-1600, to me. explained how the people had strayed from tradition and were a bit more concerned with themselves and royal people.
Q6: I think people began to stray from tradition and started coming up with their own ideas and lifestyles. They my have stopped with believing in religious things and started doing their own thing.

Giselle.g.Elv5

10/10/2013 07:35:05 am

I agree with you Alyssa on number 1 .The persons look more like royalty

Virginia.w.elv3

10/9/2013 08:52:54 pm

1. Of what i know from last yer the pictures got more realistic.
2. The colors had gotten much brighter.
3. The women with a baby because you can feel the emotion in the picture.
4.the picture from the 1310s. Because it only has a background and doesn't come out as much.
5. That they really love painting pictures. And that all the pictures tell a story
6.more tools and paints were starting to exist.

Nya.H.Elv.5

10/10/2013 12:42:30 am

6. I think that the pictures started to disapper more and not much people liked it

alyssa.w.elv2

10/10/2013 05:16:13 am

1.the one's in (1300s and 1500s) look a lot older than the one's in the (1500s and 1600s).
2. The colors changed over time in the (1300s and 1500s) it looks a lot brighter, in the (1500s and 1600s) it looks a lot darker.
3. The one's in the (1300s and 1500s) look more realistic, because you can see the detail in the painting's.
4.The one's in the (1500s and 1600s) look flat, because theirs not really a lot of detail in those paintings.
5.The people in the painting's make it look like they religious, it shows that they believe in Jesus Christ, it shows that they read the bible.
6.I think the artist got more artistic during the 1300s and 1400s because they got more ideas, more create of, more unique.

Ally.M.elv1

10/10/2013 11:07:35 am

I agreee with all your anwsers becase it is very similar to what I had.

Arrawn C. Yang Elv.5th

10/10/2013 05:37:25 am

Q1) The early 1300s-1500 are poorer and it was a pretty long time ago, the lat 1500-1600s are richere and well painted

Q2) The color changes over time because of how long it's been on earth.

Q3) I'd say the lkate 1500-1600s because it looks better the early 1300-1500s.

Q4) The 1300-1500s because it's flatter then the 1500-1600s and it's in kinda old shape because of how long it has been on earth.

Q5) They must be famous at doing something at that time.

Q6) I think that the late 1400s didn't wear nice clothes at the time like the 1500s and the late 1400s their clothes was not as colorful as the early 1500s clothes,also, the early 1500s had more fashion then the late 1400s.

eustacio.m.elv3

10/10/2013 05:37:39 am

1) Paintings from (1300-1500) were diffrent from the paintings of (1500-1600) because paintings from (1300-1500) looked like all people cared about were god. In (1500-1600) paintings looked more realistic maybe because people problity stopped thinking in just god.

2) Paintings from (1300-1500) looked more colorful than paintings from (1500-1600) because in (1500-1600) peole seemed to use more darker colors.

3) The paintings from (1500-1600) looked like they were more real because it seemed like they were more maticulas about every feture of the human body and they were more 3D.

4) The paintings from (1300-1500) were more flat because they had no background and no depth to the paintings.

5) The first four pictures seemed like the people were like they only cared about god. The last four pictures seemed like they stopped just thinking about god and started caring about themselves and not on god.

6) People problity got bored of just thinking about got and started thinking about their lives and more on what they did.

mason.i.elv

10/10/2013 11:54:33 am

I don't think those pictures are of god I think they are of king Arthur

Nahyme.R.elv5

10/10/2013 07:00:53 am

1. The paintings from the from the 1350-1500's were different from the paintings from the 1500-1600's. The paintings from the 1350-1500's were mostly about religion. However the paintings from the 1500-1600's were more about famous people during that time period.

2. The colors used in the paintings from the 1350-1500's are different from the colors used in the paintings from the 1500-1600's. The colors used in the paintings from the 1350-1500's are more bright and vibrant. However the colors used in the paintings from 1500-1600's are more dull and dark.

3. The paintings from the 1400-1600's look more realistic. I believe this because the people in the painting are more realistic and they seem to pop up from the painting. Also the colors they used in these paintings bring out an effect that makes them look more real.

4. The paintings from 1350-1500's look more flat. I believe this because in these paintings they have less detail. Although these paintings use brighter colors, they don't necessarily make the people from the paintings look realistic.

5. I think that these paintings state that the people from the different time periods had different lives. The paintings from the 1350-1500's are more about gods. This tells us that the people from this time period strongly worshipped their god. However the paintings from the 1500-1600's are more about royalty. This tells us that the people from this time period strongly worshipped their kings and queens.

6. I think that the people from those time periods wanted to take their creativity to a next level. Which I think led them to want to paint more realistically.

winston.d.elv5

10/10/2013 07:25:51 am

1.There have been more things during the1500-1600's then there were in the 1300-1400's
2. As the time kept growing the colors started to change.
3.The 1500-1600's because colors started to change.
4.The 1300-1400's because the way the pictures are.
5.There were king's and queen's as leaders at that time.
6.People started to paint different styles,and that was there style change at that period of time.

Giselle.g

10/10/2013 07:27:20 am

1) These painting have some differences . On the painting around 1300-1500 look like they are painting of religion. On the ones of 1500-1600 looks like they have just ordinary pictures of different people. On 1300-1500 you can kind of recognize the pictures on church's .1500-1600 painting are dressed up and look like they are standing in a specific kind of position. This is the different kind of subjects between the paintings.
2) The images changed colors a lot. The ones of 1300-1500 look more brighter . An the ones from 1500-1600 are much more duller.You can tell the differences by just looking at it.
3) The images look both real. But the ones that look way more are the ones from the early 1500s . They look very detailed in the face . The clothes look like the color and design people would wear during that time around.
4) What images look more flat? Well I think that the ones from the late 1300 . I think it's probably because they don't have as much color and the images don't look very detailed,
5) Well there is lots of things I can tell by the painting. 1300-1500 makes me think that around that time people were very religious . The images look like what I usually see at church's .1500-1600 makes me think that probably lots of royal people got painting of themselves. The clothes the people are wearing look very fancy.
6) I think that the artists changed on how they painted for a reason. The reason is because during the 1500 lots of people were learning lots of new things about philosophy ,science, art and much more. For this reason artists learned more things on colors , angles and how to make it look more realistic.

Tyler.J.elv3

10/10/2013 08:31:02 am

1.In the older paintings the subjects are dressed in less fancy clothing.There are more then one subjects in the older paintings then in the new ones.The newer paintings are portraits of people.
2.The new paintings had darker colors.
3.The newer paintings looked more realistic because the painters used more detail.
4.The older paintings looked flatter because the painters used more detail in the newer paintings then in the old paintings.
5.It says the people in the newer paintings worried more about their appearance then the people in the older paintings did.
6.The painters got better materials to work with on the paintings.

mason.i.elv

10/10/2013 12:00:54 pm

I agree that the newer paintings look more darker than the older paintings

Blake.W.evl3

10/10/2013 08:40:58 am

1.There are some major differences between the subjects in the earlier and later paintings. In the earlier paintings all of them were about religious things. Compared to the paintings made later which were all paintings of a person or a family.
2. The colors in the examples are changing in a way. In the earlier paintings the colors are more bright and eye popping. In the later paintings the people are wearing more dark and dull.
3. The paintings that were made later in the age are more realistic. This is because people learned how to contrast the colors and shadowing to make paintings more realistic.
4. the earlier paintings look more flat than the later paintings. this is because they were more about religion and they did not want to draw that fact away from it so they did not make the painting appealing.
5. These paintings show that the people were really religious. They also tell us how proper and wealthy they were. They also tell us that the people probable looked at these paintings a lot.
6. I think that religion played a role in the artist changing their style. when people stopped going to church there was not a need for religious painting for church so artist changed there style of painting.

Ally.M.elv1

10/10/2013 11:06:10 am

I lke the way you anwser 1 and 2 I think them two and all the other are spot on.

lilly.griffin

10/10/2013 10:05:57 am

1:the newer paintings look sharper,2;how they changed is by in the earler paintings they mostley used dirt colors such as orange brown and black and in the newer paintings they used bolder colors such as blue and purple 3;the newer paintings look more real because they have better painting matterals 4;the older paintings because the did not have they produced as time wet on 5;i think that it says that the people at that time were sivilized

Ally.M.elv1

10/10/2013 11:04:26 am

I like how you used the word sharper I think it made the anwser sound very nice I also agree with your anwser.

Jason.P.elv5

10/10/2013 10:58:41 am

1. The subjects of the earlier paintings are different from the later paintings. The earlier paintings look like religious paintings and the later paintings are different because they look like they are just paintings of regular people or leaders of some kind.

2. I think that the colors changed over time by getting more precise. I also noticed that the colors and the background in some of the paintings got darker and a little gloomier.

3. I think that the later images look more real. They look more real because they are more detailed in the people’s faces and clothes. They also look more real because there are not as many vibrant and bright colors.

4. I think that the earlier images look more flat. I think that the earlier images look more flat because there isn't as much detail put into them. Also, the shapes in some of the paintings look more bland and plain compared to the later paintings.

5. I think that the earlier paintings tell us that people were religious in that point of time and that it was a big deal to them. The later paintings tell us that people wanted to get paintings of themselves a lot more and that maybe people wanted to paint important people other than religion.

6. I think that the painting style changed because in the 1300s to 1500s, people probably cared more about religion and later it started to drift away so painters decided to paint other things such as portraits.

Kaylee.b.elv1

10/10/2013 12:22:16 pm

I agree was all of your answers because some of what you put down is what I put down too.

Ally.M.elv1

10/10/2013 11:02:31 am

1 They are more basic and not very detaled but in the 1500-1600 was very realistic a very detaled, they are also very neat.

2 From bright ond colorful to a more darker coler because I think they realised that it make it look more real.

3 The ones in 1500-1600s because they are just so detaled I really like them comared to 1300-1500s.

4 The ones from 1300-1500 is because they are a little to colorful and not very detaled because they used to much color they should be like the 1500-1600s and not use all that color.

5 They are very calm and it seems to me like they do alot of worshiping because they either are in a church or with a little baby that is wraped up in a blanket.

6 They did get alot more detaled with their work and they probly made some very good money are they got very good trade options because the painting was so nice, thank goodness they realized that the colored one just did not look that nice .

mason.i.elv2

10/10/2013 11:50:56 am

1. How are the subjects of the earlier paintings (1300s – 1500) different from the later paintings (1500-1600s)? the oldest ones have more people then the more recent pictures
2. How did the colors change over time? Earlier in the years the paintings were lighter then they were in later times
3. Which images look more real? Why? the images in more recent times look more real probably because they had better materials to draw with.
4. Which images look more flat? Why? I'd say that the pictures from earlier times look more flat then the ones in more recent times because the ones from more recent times have more texture making them look more 3D than the ones with less texture
5. What do you think these paintings say about the lives of the people living at that time? The older pictures look happy colorful and fun and the newer pictures look more serious and darker
6. What do you think happened between the late 1400s and the early 1500s that changed how and why artists painted? maybe it was the time of the black plague so people drew more sad pictures

Yurydia Carro E1

10/23/2013 12:43:53 am

I agree on #5

cameron T.elv

10/11/2013 01:06:04 am

1. The painting's in the 1300's - 1500's are about religioun. The painting's in 1500's are about people. 2. They got darker , richer and brighter.3. The one's in the 1500's - 1600's, because they are more detaled.4. Because of the type of thing's they whore then. 5. that they wanted to look good. 6. They started to paint people because they started to look at them selve's.

Zechariah.P.elv1

10/11/2013 01:09:14 am

1. The pictures from the 1300s have 3 or more people and the 1500s pictures have 1 or 2.
2. The pictures in the 1300s are brighter and the pictures are denster.
3. The 1450, the 1560, and the 1628 because the picture looks like it have more detials.
4.The ones that look flat is 1310,1325,1497,1500,and 1619 becausethey don't have any 3D to it.
5. I think the 1300s are about gods and rulers. the 1500s is about the famous people or kings and queens of that time.
6. I think the people wanted to have real lifelike pictures.

Keya.D.elv3 link

10/11/2013 09:28:39 am

1). The differences are that in the 1300's-1500 they are worshiping gods and the 1500's-1600's the birth of Jesus was happening.
2). The colors change over time by the 1300's-1500 they are doing a lot of stuff and a lot of colors 1500's-1600's they are still and not a lot of colors.
3). The 1560 and the 1628 because they look like they were painted by dots.
4). The 1325 and the 1619 because it don't look like it poke out.
5). I think they say that they worship a god,have children,and get painting painted of thereselves.
6). I think that people were dying and the painters died too.

Luke.b.elv3

10/13/2013 09:49:39 am

1.The ones from the 1300-1500 are more religious and the 1500-1600 isw more realistic.

2.The colors got brighter over time in the paintings.

3.The second set of pictures is more realistic becouse they are portraits of people.

4.The first set looks more flat becouse the second uses depth and contrasting colors.

5. This shows that the people from this time period where intrested in art and details.

6.Some one may have come out with a new style and techniqe on painting.

Elvington - NO MORE POSTS, PLEASE!!! Submit in writing.

10/13/2013 10:17:16 pm

No more posts. Submit your responses in writing to your teacher.

yurydia carro e1

10/21/2013 01:10:37 am

1.Ecclesiastical,sterility,uncongennial.
2.No, because the text says inspiration to the civilization of Roman & Greek antiquity
3.They are good at learning. They were part of a diffrent era.

kahari b.evl3

10/21/2013 06:54:32 am

1.the earlier paintings are different form the later paintings because the earlier paintings didn't have much new material that could last long 2.the colors changed over time because of weather,climate,and also time 3.the 1500-1600s looked more real because then had more ideas more martial and more knowledge to make the paintings last longer. 4.the images look more flat because there wasn't any detail into the paints the earlier the painting the more flat it would look flat the later the painting the more realistic it would look 5. i think the paintings are saying is that many people were royal or either had many riches to get there paintings done or special events. 6. i think the artist changed or improved on their work or paintings was because they wanted to express their paintings or to expire more creative people to be or go beyond that if they can do it you can either try or do.

lisettec.elv5

10/23/2013 06:14:15 am

i agree with you on number 5

larryaenl13

10/22/2013 04:43:46 am

1. 1300-1500 there are more photos of religion then there are in the 1500-1600s photos.
2.The photos darkened
3.The 1500-1600s are real looking because they have that humanly look in stead of a cartoon look.
4.The 1300-1500s are flat because they have no pop to there photos.
5.I think that the pictures say that over the time period people were more wealthy and started to not be as religious then they were.
6. I think there was a big difference in money and peoples religions.

lisettec.elv5

10/23/2013 06:13:18 am

1. The pictures from the 1300 and 1500s have are more colorful and more detailed than the ones from the 1600s.
2. The colors had become more dark overtime.
3. The images from the 1500s look more realistic because it has more detail than any other ones.
4. The images from the 1300s look more flat because they haven't discovered "shading"
5.The paintings can tell you the type of clothes they wore, and the types of things they believed in.
6.I think that they discovered new ways in drawing and sketching

Medieval and Renaissance Art

Leave a Reply.

Author

Archives

Categories